Interested Party Contributions: How IPCs Can Help You Buy a Home
Author: Eric BernsteinPublished:
Buying a home means dealing with more than just a buyer and a seller. There are multiple parties involved in the transaction—sellers, real estate agents, builders, and sometimes affiliated companies—and when any of those parties have a financial stake in the deal, they’re considered interested parties.
When interested parties contribute money toward a buyer’s closing costs, those credits are called Interested Party Contributions, or IPCs. IPCs are most commonly provided by the seller, but they can also come from builders or agents and are typically reflected on the Closing Disclosure as seller credits or closing cost assistance.
Used correctly, IPCs can significantly reduce the amount of cash a buyer needs to bring to closing. In today’s market, they’re one of the most effective tools buyers have to improve affordability without renegotiating the purchase price. The tradeoff—and where buyers can get into trouble—is that IPCs are capped. If those limits are exceeded, the excess can affect your loan-to-value ratio (LTV) and, in some cases, trigger additional costs like mortgage insurance.
That’s where structure matters. This guide breaks down exactly how Interested Party Contributions work, what the true IPC limits are, and how to maximize seller concessions without accidentally making your loan more expensive—whether you’re buying in Texas, North Carolina, or anywhere else.
What Are Interested Party Contributions (IPCs)?
Interested Party Contributions (IPCs) are credits from a financially interested party in a real estate transaction that help cover the buyer’s closing costs.
In practice, IPCs most often appear as seller concessions on the Closing Disclosure, where the seller agrees to credit a specific dollar amount toward the buyer’s closing costs.
Those credits are commonly used to cover lender fees, title and escrow charges, prepaid taxes and insurance, or to fund temporary buydowns such as a 2-1 or 1-0 buydown that lowers the buyer’s payment in the first year or two. IPCs can also come from builders—especially in new construction—who may offer closing cost credits or rate incentives, or from real estate agents who choose to credit a portion of their commission to help the deal close.
What IPCs cannot do is put money back in the buyer’s pocket. They must be applied to real costs associated with the transaction, and they are always subject to underwriting limits.
Who Can Provide IPCs?
From an underwriting standpoint, the source of the credit matters far less than the relationship to the transaction. Any party with a financial interest in the sale is considered an interested party, and underwriting looks at all credits collectively—not individually—when determining whether IPC limits have been exceeded. This means buyers can’t bypass IPC caps by splitting credits across multiple parties.
The most common sources of Interested Party Contributions include:
-
The seller, which is by far the most typical scenario and what most buyers think of when they hear “seller concessions.”
-
Homebuilders, particularly in new construction, who may offer closing cost credits, temporary rate buydowns, or preferred-lender incentives to move inventory.
-
Listing or buyer agents, who may credit a portion of their commission to help a transaction close or offset buyer closing costs.
-
Affiliated parties involved in the transaction, such as entities connected to the seller or builder that have a financial stake in the outcome.
Regardless of where the credits originate, underwriting aggregates all Interested Party Contributions and evaluates them against the same IPC limits tied to your loan type, occupancy, and loan-to-value ratio.
IPC Limits: Get Max Seller Credits When Negotiating
Every loan program imposes limits on how much a buyer can receive in Interested Party Contributions. These IPC limits exist to prevent inflated purchase prices and ensure borrowers maintain meaningful equity in the property.
For conventional loans, IPC limits depend on three factors: occupancy type, loan‑to‑value ratio (LTV), and the lesser of the purchase price or total closing costs.
Maximum IPC Limits for Conventional Loans
|
Occupancy Type |
LTV Ratio |
Maximum IPC |
|
Primary Residence or Second Home/Vacation Home |
Greater than 90% |
3% |
|
75.01%-90% |
6% |
|
|
75% or less |
9% |
|
|
Investment Property |
N/A |
2% |
These limits apply nationally. A buyer in Austin is subject to the same conventional IPC framework as a buyer in Raleigh or Charlotte.
IPC Limits for FHA Loans
FHA loans follow a simpler—but often more generous—structure when it comes to Interested Party Contributions. For FHA financing, IPCs are capped at 6% of the purchase price, regardless of loan-to-value ratio or occupancy type (as long as the property is owner-occupied).
This 6% limit can be used to cover most standard closing costs, prepaid items, discount points, and even temporary rate buydowns, making FHA loans particularly flexible for buyers with limited cash reserves. Unlike conventional loans, FHA IPCs do not fluctuate based on down payment size, which makes them easier to plan around.
IPC Limits for VA Loans
VA loans offer the most buyer-friendly IPC rules of all major loan programs. Sellers are generally allowed to contribute up to 4% of the purchase price toward what the VA defines as “seller concessions,” plus unlimited payment of normal closing costs.
In practice, this means VA buyers can often receive significantly more seller assistance than buyers using other loan types—especially when seller-paid costs like title insurance, escrow fees, and prepaid taxes are layered on top of the 4% concession cap. This structure makes VA loans exceptionally powerful in markets where sellers are willing to negotiate credits.
Because VA IPC rules are nuanced and differ from conventional and FHA treatment, proper structuring is critical to ensure credits are applied correctly and disclosed in a way that aligns with VA guidelines.
Why IPC Limits Matter More Than Most Buyers Realize For Getting Max Seller Credits
When IPCs exceed the maximum amount allowed, the excess does not disappear. Instead, underwriting treats the overage as a reduction to the purchase price.
While that may sound beneficial, it can actually increase your effective loan‑to‑value ratio and push your loan past key thresholds—most notably the 80% LTV line that triggers private mortgage insurance on conventional loans.
Too many seller concessions can turn a well‑structured loan into an unnecessarily expensive one.
How IPC Limits Can Affect Your LTV: Real‑World Examples
Example 1: Texas Purchase Using IPCs Strategically
A buyer purchases a primary residence in Texas for $400,000 and initially plans to put down 20%, resulting in a $320,000 loan and an 80% loan-to-value ratio.
At an 80% LTV, the maximum allowable IPC on a conventional loan is 6%, or $24,000. However, the seller is willing to provide 8% in credits, or $32,000, to help the buyer cover closing costs and fund a temporary rate buydown.
Rather than losing the excess credits, the buyer elects to increase their down payment by an additional 5%. By doing so, the loan amount is reduced, the LTV drops below 75%, and the allowable IPC limit increases to 9%.
With the lower LTV in place, the full 8% seller credit is now permitted. The buyer avoids mortgage insurance, maximizes the available IPCs, and meaningfully reduces their cash needed at closing—demonstrating how small adjustments to down payment strategy can unlock significantly better outcomes.
Example 2: North Carolina Buyer Where IPCs Exceed the Limit
A buyer purchases a home in North Carolina for $400,000 with a $320,000 loan, resulting in an 80% LTV.
At this LTV range, the maximum allowable IPC is 6%, or $24,000.
If the seller offers $40,000 in credits, $16,000 over the IPC limit but the buyer doesn't want to increase their down payment. Without a larger down payment, the overage must be treated as a price reduction. The adjusted purchase price becomes $384,000, which increases the effective LTV to 83.33%.
That change alone pushes the borrower above the 80% threshold and triggers private mortgage insurance—solely because the IPCs were not structured correctly.
IPCs vs. Seller Concessions: Same Concept, Different Language
Terms like seller concessions, seller credits, closing cost assistance, and IPCs are often used interchangeably. From an underwriting standpoint, they are all treated as Interested Party Contributions.
What matters is not the terminology, but whether the credits stay within allowable limits and are applied strategically.
Smart IPC Strategy: Structure Matters More Than the Amount
The goal with IPCs isn’t to simply negotiate the maximum credit. The goal is to align seller concessions with your loan structure from the start.
Well‑structured IPCs can reduce cash to close, preserve reserves, fund temporary rate buydowns, or allow buyers to adjust their down payment to stay below key LTV thresholds. Poorly structured IPCs can do the opposite—adding mortgage insurance or increasing long‑term costs without the buyer realizing why.
This is why the most important step buyers can take is to involve their lender before negotiating seller concessions. When IPC limits, LTV breakpoints, and allowable uses are modeled upfront, credits can be negotiated confidently—maximizing value without accidentally crossing thresholds that make the loan more expensive.
At LendFriend Mortgage, this is where our mortgage broker model makes a meaningful difference. Because we work across multiple lenders, we can identify which guidelines are more flexible, structure IPCs to avoid unintended LTV increases, and coordinate seller credits with down payment assistance or temporary rate buydowns. That proactive approach prevents surprises on the Closing Disclosure and ensures IPCs actually benefit the buyer—not just on paper, but in real monthly payments and long‑term costs.
FAQs About Interested Party Contributions
What are Interested Party Contributions in real estate?
Interested Party Contributions (IPCs) are closing cost credits from sellers, builders, or other financially interested parties that reduce a buyer’s out-of-pocket expenses at closing. These credits can be applied to things like lender fees, title and escrow charges, prepaid taxes and insurance, or temporary interest rate buydowns, making it easier for buyers to afford a home without changing the purchase price.
What are the IPC limits on a conventional loan?
On conventional loans, IPC limits range from 3% to 9% depending on the loan-to-value ratio (LTV) and whether the property is a primary residence, second home, or investment property. Investment properties are capped at 2%, while primary residences with lower LTVs allow for higher seller concessions.
Can IPCs cover all closing costs?
Yes, IPCs can often cover most or even all closing costs, as long as the total credits stay within allowable limits for the loan type. If IPCs exceed those limits, the excess can change how the loan is calculated and may impact items like mortgage insurance or LTV.
Do IPCs lower the purchase price?
IPCs only lower the purchase price when they exceed the maximum amount allowed by underwriting guidelines. When that happens, the excess is treated as a price reduction, which can unintentionally increase the loan-to-value ratio and affect loan terms.
Are IPC rules different in Texas or North Carolina?
The underwriting rules for IPCs are national and apply the same way in Texas, North Carolina, and other states. What does vary by market is how willing sellers are to offer credits, which is influenced by local inventory levels, demand, and negotiating leverage.
Final Thought: IPCs Are Powerful—When Used Correctly
Interested Party Contributions are one of the most effective tools buyers have in today’s market—but only when they’re used with intention. Properly structured, IPCs can significantly reduce cash to close, improve short‑term affordability, and create flexibility during negotiations without changing the purchase price.
What matters most is understanding that IPCs aren’t free money. They interact directly with your loan‑to‑value ratio, mortgage insurance requirements, and long‑term costs. The same credit can be a major win in one scenario and a costly mistake in another.
That’s why strategy matters more than headlines. In many cases, IPCs can be more powerful than a purchase price reduction. If your goal is to avoid bringing cash to closing or to meaningfully lower your monthly payment in the first few years through a temporary rate buydown, seller credits often deliver more immediate and practical value than shaving a small amount off the price.
At LendFriend Mortgage, we structure IPCs around the outcome you actually care about—cash, payment, or leverage—so they work in your favor, not against you. When credits are aligned with your loan structure from the start, IPCs become a tool that improves the deal instead of complicating it. Schedule a call or get in touch with me by completing this quick form to get started.
About the Author:
Eric Bernstein